| Il Corriere della Sera, July 11, 2007 THE LEFT dead ends Democratic Party and labor policies of | One of the reasons which underlie the Democratic Party - not the main, but not one of the least important - is the need for liberal Democrats to get out of blind alleys in which the Italian left was driven over the last decade policy labor affecting its design, striving to play a leading role in the European debate on these issues. The left one has got every time, for fear of discussion on some points of his old firm, has chosen to defend it with a slogan exhaustive, almost a catechism precept, which aimed to cut off the debate in the bud, but also to burn the bridges behind him, to preclude any future change of heart. For example: when, around 2000, has begun - even within the center, with a bill of Tiziano Treu-to discuss the possibility and opportunity to reform the individual protection against dismissal, the DS and the CGIL, followed obviously from the radical left, has declared Article 18 of the Statute of the sacred and inviolable, as the 'bulwark in defense of freedom and dignity in the workplace, "and this slogan have organized demonstrations ocean. slogan is false because no one can seriously claim that hundreds of millions of Europeans to work in conditions of substantial and undignified servitude, because they are without Article 18, but evoke the dignity and freedom of the human person was a move convenient and effective to close the debate before it opened. The node is then promptly came to a head in 2002 when the radical left, take our word for DS and CGIL, has promosso il referendum per estendere il campo di applicazione dell'articolo 18 alle imprese con meno di 16 dipendenti. Logico: se è in gioco la libertà e la dignità delle persone, tutti devono goderne. Ma le cose non stanno così e l'estensione dell' inamovibilità di fatto del lavoratore anche alle imprese minori sarebbe una follia; per questo, l'anno dopo Ds e Cgil sono stati costretti a fare poco dignitosamente il pesce in barile, adoperandosi sostanzialmente perché il referendum fallisse. Intanto, però, sul piano della possibile riforma, il discorso era bloccato: col chiudere la questione in un cassetto gettando la chiave, Ds e Cgil si erano preclusi di affrontarla seriamente per un lungo tempo a venire. Ora Green Paper on employment policy of 'European Union explicitly invites us to rethink the regulation of dismissals for economic reasons, but the Italian center was placed in a position of not being able to participate effectively in this debate: the topic is off limits. He'll know the Democratic Party, with moderation and intelligence, free from this mental block? Something similar happens on the delicate question of the possibility to vary the minimum standards of treatment of workers in poorer regions with high unemployment: here the closure of the debate without prior appeal is entrusted with the slogan "no cages wage." In fact, leave a space for collective bargaining decentralized to differentiate the level and structure of pay, taking into account the specific conditions of each region, it is the opposite of imposing a 'cage' the real 'cage', if anything, is the barrier that prevents you from doing so. Mal'artificio dialectic is most effective: those who could never be in favor of something called "cage wage"? So what slogan you, again, to drop a tombstone on the issue of possible decentralization of bargaining with the minimum standards, although this trend is just now overwhelmingly in the industrialized West. The PD is not asked to be biased in favor o contrario a quella differenziazione di standard, ma solo di saper aprire su di essa una discussione pragmatica. È ancora lo stesso errore quello che la sinistra ha commesso quando ha precipitosamente demonizzato la legge Biagi, oppure lo «scalone pensionistico » (altro slogan efficacissimo) destinato a entrare in vigore nel 2008, solo perché varati dall'odiato governo di centrodestra; e ha ripetuto l'errore quando, ancora per questo solo motivo, di quelle norme ha avventatamente sancito la necessità dell'abrogazione ponendola addirittura tra i punti essenziali del proprio programma elettorale. Salvo poi scoprire che la legge Biagi è uno strumento utile contro l'abuso dei contratti di lavoro precari e quindi servirsene For this purpose, as did the Minister of Labour Damiano in the call center, or to acknowledge honestly-as they did but unfortunately untimely Massimo D'Alema and Piero Fassino in recent days - that the rule of retirement at 60 years, though introduced with the "staircase" of Maroni, it is not unfair and makes available resources to address social issues far more urgent (there was not a "staircase" much more steep one introduced by the Dini reform of 1995, by a vote of the center? ). The Democratic Party was also created to leave behind so biased and unintelligent to address the issues, to enable the center to get out of alleys blind which is driven in recent years and develop a labor policy more pragmatic, more open to doubt and experimentation. But on this point, the new party must have the courage to give immediately an unequivocal and strong signal.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
|
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
Baby Shower Diaper Castle Instructions
Democratic Party and labor policies
0 comments:
Post a Comment